U.S. President Donald Trump called into conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh’s radio show on Friday, October 9th, during which he discussed Iranian support for US-designated terrorist groups and his decision to withdraw from Barack Obama’s Iran nuclear deal.
Trump’s two-hour-long interview on Limbaugh’s show was portrayed as a “virtual rally” which was broadcast across the U.S. for his supporters.
During the conversation, Trump told listeners that Iran had been “put on notice” and that the country would face consequences if its leaders stepped out of line.
Trump said the following:
“Iran knows that… If you f*ck around with us, if you do something bad to us, we are going to do things to you that have never been done before.”
Limbaugh’s radio show had to censor the President’s expletive comment though footage of Limbaugh in the studio caught the uncensored words.
Trump don't "fuck" with us. pic.twitter.com/0gB9s6yDdk
— Yaakov Pollak (@Yanky_Pollak) October 9, 2020
Trump withdrew the U.S. in 2018 from the Iran nuclear deal brokered under the Obama administration, expressing he did so because there weren’t enough restrictions on the country’s nuclear program. Trump has consistently said the U.S. got a “bad deal.”
The president told Limbaugh that Iran would make a new nuclear deal with the U.S. if he wins the upcoming November 3rd election, saying he would secure a ‘great deal’ within a month.
According to the New York Post, Trump added:
“I hate to say it on an important show like this, but I’ll say it, you don’t see the terror the way you used to see the terror. And they know if they do anything against us, they’ll pay 1,000-fold.”
It’s not clear if Trump broke the law when he swore on the airwaves. However, the Federal Communications Commission, which regulates the industry, says that federal law prohibits “obscene, indecent and profane content from being broadcast.”
Earlier this year in January, Trump ordered the assassination by drone of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, commander of Iran’s clandestine overseas paramilitary force, after the U.S. said he was aiding in plots against the United States. U.S. officials assassinated Soleimani in an airstrike near Baghdad, at its airport with Iraqi militia head Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis also losing his life. The strike put the region on the brink of war for the weeks following, leaving many on the internet believing that we were headed for war.
The strike on Soleimani in January was justified by the U.S. Department of Defence as being “aimed at deterring future Iranian attack plans.” The agency further added, ” Soleimani was actively developing plans to attack American diplomats and service members in Iraq and throughout the region. General Soleimani and his Quds Force were responsible for the deaths of hundreds of American and coalition service members and the wounding of thousands more. He had orchestrated attacks on coalition bases in Iraq over the last several months – including the attack on December 27th.”
Iran retaliated after the killing of Soleimani days later by firing more than a dozen ballistic missiles at two Iraqi airbases housing U.S. forces, NBC reported.
Following that act a few months later an Iranian prosecutor Ali Alghasimehr proclaimed the country had issued an unlikely enforceable Interpol red notice arrest warrant for United States President Donald Trump and others for their role in the assassination of a leading military commander. Still, Iran’s Alqasimehr further stated that it will continue to pursue the indictment long after Trump’s presidency, Anewspost previously reported.
Trump has broad powers in matters of military conflict under the U.S. constitution. However, some experts raised questions about the legality of the strike. Trump very likely faces no danger of arrest, but the charges emphasize the heightened tensions between Iran and the United States since Trump withdrew America from Tehran’s nuclear deal years ago. In addition to withdrawing from the nuclear deal, Trump has imposed numerous economic sanctions on the country’s oil industry, as well as banking and other key sectors for Iran’s economy.
Colombian Govt Wants To Legalize Cocaine And Then Sell It
This article was originally published On Dec 3, 2020
Colombia is one of the most notorious producers of cocaine in the world, despite the fact that the country has gone to great lengths in hopes of diminishing the trade of the drug trade within its borders.
Now, some members of the Columbian government are proposing a new approach. They are calling for the drug to be legalized and for the government to take control of the industry for themselves.
In a new bill first proposed earlier this year, senators Iván Marulanda and Feliciano Valencia call for the Colombian government to take total control of the cocaine industry to bolster public funds and cut violent cartels out of the trade.
In a recent interview with VICE, Marulanda explained that the government would purchase coca at market price from the 200,000 farming families that are believed to be involved in the trade.
Columbia is considering a bill that makes the government buy up and sell the country’s cocaine production.
HOLY. SHIT. So instead try to stamp out drugs, Columbia tries to take control of the trade and regulate the problem? https://t.co/8SBmE45dmX
— Jason Ng (@ByJasonNg) December 2, 2020
The senators argued that it would actually be cheaper for authorities to buy the crop from the farmers than it would for them to destroy their crops. It costs the government roughly $1 billion every year to destroy coca crops, while it would only cost about $680 million to buy it.
“The thing is, we have to recover control over the state. We’re losing control of the state to corruption, narcos in politics. They’re in municipalities, in departments and in congress. All the way to the highest echelons of government,” Marulanda explained.
From here, the state would supply cocaine to users and research groups looking to study its use for painkillers, but it would not be sold recreationally. However, cocaine use is already legal in Columbia, after a court ruled that personal consumption was a human right.
Marulanda is not sure if his bill will make an impact, or how long it will take to gain traction, but he is hoping to make it a major election issue in 2022.
‘The first big obstacle is to open up the conversation among public opinion. This has been a giant taboo. Colombians are born and raised under this assumption that drug-trafficking is a war. There’s no information about coca and cocaine. So, with this bill we hope to open the conversation,” he explained.
In recent years, the government has stepped up their military-police-style enforcement of the industry, and yet cocaine production continues to grow in the country.
Coca cultivation reached 212,000 hectares last year, a rise of nearly 2% from 208,000 hectares the year before, according to figures released by the White House in March. Potential pure cocaine production, meanwhile, rose to 951 metric tons, an 8% increase, according to the Associated Press.
“It’s pretty remarkable that they manually eradicated 100,000 hectares last year and didn’t move the needle,” Adam Isacson of the Washington Office on Latin America think tank said earlier this year. “I guess it means replanting has at least kept pace.”
It seems that no matter what the government does, the cocaine keeps on coming, so politicians are willing to try things that may drastic. However, as Marulanda pointed out in his interview with Vice, cutting out the criminal middlemen will reduce the violence seen in the country’s drug war, and also make the drug safer for the people who use it.
Another Little Black Book That Once Belonged To Epstein With New Names Is Found
It is well-known that the late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein kept detailed records of all the powerful people that he stayed in contact with. There is a notorious “little black book” that was published by Gawker in 2015, which exposed many of the powerful people in his circle. This book is believed to contain the contacts that he most frequently called around 2004 and 2005. However, a new list of contacts, recently published by The Insider, reveals new names that were friends with Epstein in the 1990s.
The new black book has the names of 349 people, many of whom did not appear in the list that was previously released to the public.
Among the names on the list are Suzanne Ircha, who’s married to Woody Johnson, owner of the New York Jets, famous wall street investor Carl Icahn, supermarket owner John A. Catsimatidis, actress Morgan Fairchild, former New Republic owner Marty Peretz; and Cristina Greeven, the wife of CNN anchor Chris Cuomo.
The new black book was made public through a strange twist of fate. A woman initially found the book in the late 1990s and saved it for many years until she finally sold it on eBay.
Denise Ondayko, the woman who found the book, said she was walking down Fifth Avenue in the mid-’90s when she spotted a black address book on the ground. She said that she didn’t realize it was Epstein’s book at the time, because he was pretty much unknown to the public, but she did realize that it had a lot of famous names and figured that it might be worth something, so she held onto it.
Last year, Ondayko was cleaning out an old storage unit where she was keeping some of her things and she stumbled upon the book. Now that Epstein was all over the news, the information contained in the book was much more obvious to identify.
Ondayko said she reached out to everyone in the media that she could, including John Oliver, Rachel Maddow, and The New York Times, but none of them ever got back to her, so she eventually just put it up for sale on eBay.
The buyer was Chris Helali, an aspiring politician from Vermont. He purchased the book for $425.
Helali also tried reaching out to the media, including journalists that were already reporting on Epstein, but none of them seemed interested. Finally, Nick Bryant, the reporter who wrote the original Gawker black book story forwarded the book to the Insider who decided to publish.
Insider hired Dennis Ryan, a former forensic document examiner and laboratory supervisor for the Nassau County Police Department, to verify the authenticity of the book. Ryan says that the book is definitely from the late 90s, and many of the dates and addresses match up perfectly with Epstein’s properties and known contacts at the time.
The Insider also reached out to dozens of contacts listed in the book who had never previously been publicly associated with Epstein. Fourteen acknowledged on the record that they knew or had met Epstein in the ’90s.
There are over 120 names that appear in both books, including Donald Trump and Bill Clinton. Some of the other names included, Steve Rattner, Beth Anne Bovino, Dominique Bluhdorn, Jill Harth, Ted Field, Robert Nunnery, Stanley Shopkorn, Steve Ruchevsky, Ellen Susman, William and Ann Nitze, Les Gelb, Ron Daniel, Sandy Warner, Cyril Fung, Marius Fortelni, Michael Cutlip. Many of these names aren’t necessarily famous, but they are very powerful people in business and finance.
The address book is now available in a searchable database on the Insider, but it is unfortunately hidden behind a paywall.
Ghislaine Maxwell’s Lawyers Cite Cosby Case As Precedent To Have Her Released From Prison
Last week, former actor Bill Cosby was released from prison on a technicality, despite the fact that he admitted to drugging and assaulting multiple women, and was accused by many others. After his release, legal experts warned that the ruling could set a dangerous precedent that attorneys in similar cases would use to get their clients released as well.
Now, just a week later, Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyers are arguing that she should have her case thrown out on the same grounds, according to The Guardian.
Cosby was released because the prosecutor involved initially didn’t press any charges, and claimed that Cosby would not be facing any legal trouble, so when Cosby later confessed, his confession was called into question and no longer admissible in court. The judge also ruled that Cosby had no chance of a fair trial because evidence that was not admissible was so freely available in the media that the jury was unable to make a judgment without considering those facts.
Maxwell’s case is similar because the first time that Epstein was arrested for human trafficking, he was given a sweetheart deal by Alex Acosta, a friendly prosecutor. The deal helped Epstein avoid any serious jail time, but it also gave him and his associates legal protection from being held accountable for any future crimes.
Obviously, it is not possible to shield a criminal from the consequences of actions that they will take in the future, so Epstein was arrested again many years later after it was discovered that he continued his crimes long after his initial arrest. If Epstein and his friends did have any kind of immunity from that deal, it ended when they continued to commit crimes after the deal was made.
Still, Maxwell’s lawyers are optimistic after Cosby’s recent release.
“The government is trying to renege on its agreement and prosecute Ms Maxwell over 25 years later for the exact same offenses for which she was granted immunity,” Maxwell’s lawyers wrote in a statement to Judge Alison Nathan.
However, the judge has previously ruled that the deal did not apply to the current case.
In an opinion piece for the New York Daily News, Maxwell’s attorney David Oscar Markus wrote that releasing Bill Cosby from prison was the right decision, and that Ghislaine Maxwell should be released as well. Markus argued that prosecutors should have to keep the promises that they make to suspects, because people will sometimes incriminate themselves if they think they have immunity.
However, many times prosecutors are corrupt and make promises that are against the best interests of the public, as we saw in Jeffrey Epstein’s first “sweetheart deal” with Alex Acosta while he was district attorney in Southern, Florida. Prosecutors are lawyers, they aren’t the judge and jury, and they shouldn’t hold this much power in a case this serious.
Judge Alison Nathan has not yet responded to the recent request, but she did condemn the recent opinion piece that was published by her lawyers in the New York Daily News earlier this week.
News1 year ago
Pedophiles Panic As New Epstein Flight Logs Set To Be Revealed
News3 years ago
Alabama Passes Law to Chemically Castrate Pedophiles
Tech2 years ago
The New Bugatti La Voiture Noire Is Worth £14 Million
News2 years ago
Iranian Presidential Adviser Posted A List Showing Locations For All Trump’s Properties
In case you missed it1 year ago
NASA Chief Warns That Humans Must Prepare For A Massive Meteor Strike
Anonymous3 years ago
Anonymous Message to the People of Hong Kong
Tech2 years ago
DeLorean Confirms Plan To Redesign and Produce A New Line Of DMC 12S Cars
In case you missed it2 months ago
Man Used Internet Registry to Track down and Beat up Pedophiles
In case you missed it1 year ago
Father Shoots Man Who Kidnapped & Raped His Son, On National TV
Anonymous2 years ago
Anonymous Warns Citizens Of The World About Coming Global Lockdown
News3 years ago
Leonardo-backed fund Pledges $5 Million To Preserve Amazon Rainforest
Politics3 years ago
Ilhan Omar’s Arrest Record And Corruption Charges Revealed
Nature2 years ago
No More Coffins, Organic Burial Pods Will Turn Bodies Into Trees
Anonymous2 years ago
Anonymous Predicts What Coronavirus Will Bring In The Coming Months
News1 year ago
China Releases New Frightening Video Showing Attack On U.S. Guam Military Base
News2 years ago
New Surveillance Footage Shows George Floyd Was Not Resisting Arrest
Anonymous2 years ago
Anonymous Message To Greta Thunberg
News1 year ago
Chinese State Media: “If U.S. Troops Return To Taiwan, China Will Start A War”
News2 years ago
Military Base Where Soldiers Have Been Murdered Get’s Caught Up In Child Trafficking Sting
Anonymous1 year ago
Anonymous Message On The Worldwide Fight Against Child Trafficking